Blog

Category: News

Malcolm Wallop Dies

14 September 2011

Associated Press reports from Cheyenne, Wyoming, that Western pioneer descendant and former Wyoming U.S. Sen. Malcolm Wallop has died at age 78. The anti-Communist Republican, who served in the Senate for 18 years, is the first elected official to propose space-based missile defense, which became part of the Strategic Defense Initiative.

But I remember Sen. Wallop, an advocate for property rights, as one of only two U.S. senators during the historic Clinton health care plan debate of 1993-1994 to proclaim (rightly) that health care is not a right. During this crucial national debate, which preceded America’s socialized medicine, ObamaCare, Sen. Wallop named the flawed premise of government-dictated medicine by standing on the Senate floor and declaring that health care is not a right (Texas Sen. Phil Gramm was the only other senator to say it). Despite Republican attempts to compromise and pass the Clinton health care plan, socialized medicine was defeated; the Clinton administration’s widely unpopular concept never became a piece of legislation.

According to his official bio, Wallop was also the first non-lawyer in U.S. Senate history to serve on the Judiciary Committee and, as ranking Republican member of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee from 1990 to 1994, Sen. Wallop was an outspoken advocate for development of domestic energy supplies of coal, oil and natural gas. Wallop pushed for an amendment to the 1980 Clean Water Act, barring federal usurpation of state control of water, authored the Sunset of the Carter Era Windfall Profits Tax, the first sunsetted tax in history, and he sponsored the 1977 Wallop Amendment to the Surface Mining Control Act, which directed the federal government to compensate, through purchase or exchange, owners of mineral rights whose right to mine had been denied by government regulation. In 1981, Congress enacted his legislation to cut inheritance and gift taxes. He later founded his own grass-roots organization, Frontiers of Freedom, whose agenda includes “preservation of property rights and reform of the Endangered Species Act, the privatization of Social Security, protection of civil liberties and the defeat of such big government initiatives as the antiterrorism bill and the national ID card legislation, and reform of the Food and Drug Administration.”

In 1996, Steve Forbes asked Wallop to be general chairman and executive director of his presidential bid, leading to changes which led to primary victories in both Delaware and Arizona. The Yale University graduate served in the U.S. Army as a First Lieutenant from 1955 to 1957 and was a member of the Wyoming Legislature from 1969 to 1976. His extensive business career includes management of the Wyoming ranch holdings he owned and the self-described rancher, businessman, real estate developer and investor jointly ventured oil and gas development projects in Nebraska, Montana and Wyoming. Mr. Wallop died Wednesday afternoon at his home near Big Horn, Wyoming.

Exclusive: A New 9/11 Mystery

10 September 2011

Ten years ago, following the 9/11 attack, I came across a story concerning one of the hijackers, which I first mentioned in the November 1, 2001, edition of my war newsletter (now on hiatus). After pursuing the tale, which I must emphasize is unconfirmed, with federal police, intelligence sources, and major media outlets, I feel the trail has gone cold, so I’m recounting part of the story here for the first time. My purpose is to generate interest in the jihadist act of war on 9/11.

During a post-9/11 visit to Lake Tahoe, sources told me that the FBI was investigating one of the Islamic jihadist hijacker’s recent visits to Lake Tahoe, where he had stayed at a motel with a woman for several days prior to the September 11 attack. The source(s), with whom I met in person and interviewed, were guarded and adamant about not going public with the information. I wanted to know more, so I investigated the report, which included information that the jihadist made several telephone calls to Saudi Arabia from the motel. I was told that the FBI had interviewed motel employees and that the woman was still at large.

Ten years later, after trying to learn more details, obtain an investigative media assignment, and cooperate with certain law enforcement contacts, I still have not confirmed the story. If it’s true, and I consider the source(s) reliable, I still do not know why the Islamic hijacker and the mystery woman were visiting Lake Tahoe, a large, beautiful lake nestled atop the Sierra Nevada Mountains along the California/Nevada border. As I wrote in 2001, if true, the report re-affirms that the 9/11 hijackers were everywhere from Maine to California, suggests that women may be involved, and that the magnitude of the attack’s coordination is huge and could only be accomplished by state sponsors of jihadism. Considered in the context of the attack, this story may add to what we already know: the fact that the hijackers obtained huge amounts of money, resources, plans, contacts, and logistical support. As I wrote then, and as I strongly suspect now, the Lake Tahoe story also suggests that there may still be unknown information about the attack and, if so, that the media is not investigating, or choosing not to report, crucial facts of the attack.

I have not seen a single report indicating any press awareness or government acknowledgement of this reported FBI investigation, though I have persistently sought both. During my meetings and conferences, in cities from Washington, D.C. to California, I have become convinced that there is more, possibly much more, to the story of how and why America was attacked by jihadists chiefly from Saudi Arabia. The report raises several questions: Was Lake Tahoe a target? Did the hijackers visit other cities and locations? What does the government know about their movements, maneuvers and contacts? Have contacts been identified and do we know if they are complicit? Are they being sought? Were the Saudi phone numbers linked to members of the religious dictatorship and/or its Islamic government officials? Ten years after the worst act of war in U.S. history, with no military purpose, victory or end to war in sight, I still want to solve the mystery. And win the war.

Professor Barnett on ObamaCare Court Ruling

8 September 2011

When the Richmond, Virginia-based Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued its ruling against the state of Virginia’s case against ObamaCare this morning, I asked one of the nation’s most knowledgeable legal scholars, Georgetown law professor Randy Barnett, whom I interviewed earlier this year, for a statement. Dr. Barnett responded: “For a case that some said was a “no brainer” to uphold the Affordable Care Act [ObamaCare], three federal courts of appeals have adopted three different positions, each in 2 -1 decisions over a dissenting opinion. If any litigation ever cried out for resolution by the Supreme Court—and soon—it is this one. It is high time for the high court.”

Oscar de la Hoya: Recovery is Selfish

1 September 2011

In a Yahoo! Sports article by Kevin Iole, world champion boxer Oscar de la Hoya admits to being an alcoholic, cheating on his wife, and considering suicide. Read the article here.

But in an act that may take more courage than getting in the boxing ring, de la Hoya says he’s chosen to seek help because he is selfish, which he regards as a virtue, not a vice. As 38-year-old de la Hoya, who admitted himself for addiction treatment into the Betty Ford clinic, said: “I did this for myself…I’ve learned the hard way [that] being an addict isn’t easy, especially for a public person like me. I’ve had people of all walks of life coming up to me and crying and telling me about their lives and problems. I’m happy if I could help them and get them some relief, but I did what I did for me.”

Good for de la Hoya, who announced his retirement in 2009 and is the president of Golden Boy Promotions. Everyone knows that cleaning up and overcoming addiction is enormously difficult. Not everyone knows that being selfish is the first step.

Three 9/11 DVDs: Discovery, CNN, Independent

26 August 2011

In 2005, I reviewed three documentaries (all now available on DVD), including Cable News Network’s comprehensive first anniversary tribute, America Remembers: The Events of September 11 and America’s Response. CNN’s 2002 DVD includes footage of memorial services and President George W. Bush’s address to a joint session of Congress following the attack.

In one segment, a CNN producer reveals that, after the first plane, hijacked by Islamic fundamentalists, was crashed into the World Trade Center, as people in the newsroom watched the live feeds, looking at the huge hole in the side of the building, someone said: “That’s no accident.” I wrote that the DVD is worth watching for several reasons, not the least of which is the remarkable photography, now as much a part of our history as the Japanese planes bombing our ships at Pearl Harbor. CNN includes rare video captures of the first plane screaming into New York City and a close-up of the first plane’s gaping hole. The producers feature shots you probably haven’t seen.

Also reviewed are the independent Remember September 11, 2001 and The Flight That Fought Back, the Discovery Channel’s 90-minute chronological recreation of United Air Lines Flight 93—on which passengers resisted the Moslem hijackers—narrated by 24‘s Keifer Sutherland, which is the most compelling. Each of the three programs minimize the role of ideas, i.e., fundamentalist Islam, in the enemy attack. The Flight That Fought Back reconstructs the day’s events using actors and brief simulations. Read the complete 2005 article here.

Jihadists Target U.S. Comedian

18 August 2011

Comedian and CBS Late Show television host David Letterman has been named by the enemy for assassination—and the United States government essentially has nothing to say, let alone do, about it.

This week, a private intelligence organization that monitors jihadist activity online identified Mr. Letterman, an American who has been outspoken in denouncing Islamic attacks on America, as an enemy target. An Associated Press (AP) report indicated that the threat was made on a popular Internet destination for jihadist Moslems by a jihadist reacting to what he said Letterman did after the U.S. military announced in June that a strike in Pakistan had killed an Al Qaeda terrorist leader. The jihadist reportedly urged an Islamic terrorist to cut Mr. Letterman’s tongue “and shut it forever[.]” The private firm, part of the Site Intelligence Group, told AP that the forum is frequently used by Al Qaeda.

The Obama administration is silent on the threat. Only the New York office of the FBI issued a statement and it minimized the threat against Mr. Letterman, stating that all threats are taken seriously. This response is a disgrace to the nation. The U.S. administration should vow to wipe out any person, group, and sponsors that plot to kill the comedian, who is among the first renowned, non-military U.S. citizens to be named by jihadists for extermination. Given the Obama administration’s weak, appeasing response, Mr. Letterman, an Indianapolis, Indiana, native and protege of the late Johnny Carson, is not likely to be the last, and the effect is devastating: anyone who mocks or denounces jihadism may be threatened by the enemy and the American government will say or do nothing about it. On the contrary, throughout Obama’s presidency, he has sought to appease Islamic terrorists and their sponsors, celebrating Moslem rituals in the White House and having his administration target and denounce a Florida preacher who planned to burn the Koran—an outrageous and unprecedented act of censorship and vicious assault by the state on an individual’s right to free speech.

Obama has a predecessor in his administration’s turning of the other cheek to a jihadist death threat. As Leonard Peikoff observed years ago, President George H.W. Bush all but ignored Iran’s call to murder British author Salman Rushdie and his U.S. publishers on the grounds of blasphemy for Mr. Rushdie’s book The Satanic Verses, a total abdication of the President’s moral duty as commander-in-chief to defend U.S. citizens and businesses. Last year, jihadists threatened the creators of South Park for a depiction of the Islamic prophet Mohammed and writer and filmmaker Theo van Gogh was murdered in Amsterdam in 2004 by a Dutch Moslem angered by his film Submission, a story of abused Islamic women, so, the death threat against David Letterman is a significant escalation of the jihadists’ war against America and the West. The Obama administration’s passive response to the threat is a serious dereliction of its duty to defend America and Americans.

The FBI investigates crimes. But Al Qaeda’s threat is not merely a crime; it is also an avowed act of war. As Dr. Peikoff—the lone voice of reason in America on the fatwa against Salman Rushdie—wrote in 1989: “Force is the only language intelligible to those who live by force.” President Obama should declare that the U.S. government will actively protect and defend David Letterman and retaliate with military action against any states connected, through harboring, training, or sponsorship, to an assassination plot. The Obama administration has done more to protect the Koran than it has to protect an American threatened with death by Al Qaeda. It is time for Obama to put defending an American life above appeasing jihadist Islam.

(Un) American Crackdown

17 August 2011

Back in October of 2010, with Greek unrest and riots in France, I forecast that lawlessness was likely to get worse throughout the West’s welfare states and we’ve seen this summer’s anarchy in Great Britain with widespread looting and rioting. In London, and here in America, we have also seen criminal flash mobs organizing through social media, converging upon certain pre-designated locations to loot, rob and destroy private property, as police across the country are imposing new curfews and crackdowns. Several new government restrictions have been imposed by the cities of Philadelphia and Chicago and in Maryland. This week, a new curfew is being considered in Kansas City and, as roving mobs, gangs, and anarchists continue to strike using social media, the city of San Francisco declared a total shutdown of cellular service in certain parts of the city, which had been targeted by protestors against the city’s government-controlled transportation system, during rush hour.

With reports of new outbursts of coordinated criminal activity popping up all over the country—from attacks on an Apple store in Connecticut and a Walgreens in Chicago to a 7-Eleven in Maryland and a local sheriff’s emergency communications system in Los Angeles County besieged by a rapper’s coordinated telephone attack—we can expect harsher measures from local, state, and federal government. This is the implosion of the welfare state; as government improperly expands its role into our lives, regulating light bulbs, plastic bags and every aspect of existence, government fails to perform its proper function, such as defense of the nation and private property through the courts, police, and military. Law and order breaks down while individual rights are wiped out. It’s not enough that the nation’s travel infrastructure has been turned into a government-controlled maze of dictates under a Department of Homeland Security bureaucracy known as the Transportation Security Administration (TSA); the entire country is heading toward some form of lockdown. The welfare state becomes the police state.

Curfews as a temporary measure while police investigate crimes are one thing and I don’t see why police shouldn’t monitor social media for evidence of criminal activity. Curfews as a permanent way of life are not consistent with a free society. Tyranny begins with restrictions on free travel and association and tyranny begins in earnest with censorship, including shutting down technology and cell phone service in certain places, at certain times, in certain contexts. From the President singling out a broadcaster for attack to dozens of examples of censorship in recent years, free speech, as with property rights, is under siege. Recently, a government school board banned a Sherlock Holmes book in Virginia on the grounds that author Arthur Conan Doyle offends religion. History shows that such violations of man’s rights end with people in chains—or worse.

Americans should not tolerate censorship, including shutdowns of cellular service. Americans should demand that police show zero tolerance for criminals who disrupt public safety and threaten lives and property. But by allowing government to control every aspect of their lives, Americans have put government in a position to shut down free speech, which is why we must demand that government end its monopolies on roads and transportation, education and the economy and let people make choices in a free market. We should not tolerate permanent curfews in our cities, towns and counties. But we should not have tolerated dictates from the Department of Homeland Security, with its obscene TSA, (or the Department of Education, et al) in the first place.

Crackdown by crackdown, while government types blame criminals for damaging their race when they should arrest them for damaging lives and property, freedom in America is coming to an end. With every crime wave and act of war, the government increases its controls and shuts down man’s rights. So, Americans must stop passively standing in line at the airport, Department of Motor Vehicles, and everywhere else that government does not belong and speak out against this incremental, permanent paralysis. We must speak out and insist upon a secular, capitalist republic based on individual rights. While we can.

The 2012 Republicans

15 August 2011

With the 2012 presidential campaign well underway, I thought I’d size up each major contender from my perspective as an Objectivist. As for the President, Democrat Barack Obama, I think Leonard Peikoff is right that he’s an anti-American nihilist. Obama’s been a disaster for America. I took an early interest in his 2008 candidacy, long before his campaign took root, writing in my online column in February 2007 that he was worth watching, and I considered voting for him in this long post, which I amended a few weeks later (see postscript to that post) when I gave my comments a second thought and totally rejected his candidacy.

I think it’s pretty clear, and I’ve stated many times, that religious fundamentalist President George W. Bush and his fellow Republicans for selfless war (Iraq, Afghanistan) and the welfare state (socialized medicine, TARP, bailouts) all but made Barack Obama inevitable and, with conservatives contaminating the Tea Party, the Obama administration’s nonstop assault on capitalism is making the spread of religious totalitarianism more likely, too. In his final public course last year in Las Vegas, which I wrote about here, Dr. Peikoff warned about some of these developments while addressing a cultural hypothesis which is the subject of his forthcoming book.

Here’s my take on the pathetic GOP field, including undeclared but often discussed possible candidates:

Obamney is a term that suits Mitt Romney. The former Massachusetts governor and son of pragmatist Michigan Governor George Romney enacted socialized medicine, a mandatory scheme created by the conservative Heritage Foundation, which was the blueprint for ObamaCare. Dubbed ObamneyCare by an early 2012 opponent, Mormon faith-based Romney’s insistence on defending government-run medicine fits with his agenda for government-controlled private lives, making Mitt Romney unacceptable for advocates for individual rights.

The folksy Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann is the worst of everything. Apparently, Rep. Bachmann believes that America was founded as a Christian theocracy and should become one again, and her views on everything from banning a woman’s right to an abortion to her work as an attorney for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) show that she seeks total government control of people’s lives. As a devout Christian, Bachmann, who campaigned for “born-again” Christian Democrat Jimmy Carter for president in 1976, stalked patients at abortion clinics. Whatever good positions she takes are taken as matters of faith and her entire approach is based on faith, not reason. Her campaign has been accused by CNN anchor Don Lemon of initiation of the use of force during the Iowa campaign, a charge which should be taken seriously, and Rep. Bachmann is the second most dangerous major candidate currently in the race.

Self-described Christian “champion of conservative principles” Rick Perry prays and fasts in the face of the worst economy since the 1930s depression. The Texas governor, a former Democrat who once worked for Al Gore, announced his candidacy for president with a wild-eyed look that suggests a lust for power. He opposes a woman’s right to an abortion, supports a Texas law, later struck down by the state’s Supreme Court, that criminalizes sex between consenting adults, and his first major foray into presidential politics, an utterly improper prayer event that mixed religion and state, is telling. Anti-capitalist former New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani (non-candidate) is known chiefly for doing his job during the jihadist attack on September 11, 2001, and saying good things about America, and tough things about our enemies, in its aftermath. Before that, Mayor Giuliani was known for dabbling in fascism as he violated free speech rights and, previously, for crusading against capitalism in New York. He’s also anti-abortion. Sarah Palin (non-candidate) is, politically, a loser, quitter, and opportunist. The Christian conservative once reportedly sought to ban books and imposed a gag order on town departments as a village mayor. She was governor of Alaska for about a year and a half before she quit to be a full-time celebrity after losing by a wide margin in her campaign for the vice-presidency. Sarah Palin, who supported Bush’s bailouts, has since exploited her children and family repeatedly in public, in social media, and on her so-called reality television program, which was cancelled.

Ron Paul, an obstetrician who once ran for president as the nominee of the anarchist Libertarian Party, would stand by while the United States is attacked by jihadist Iran. The Texas congressman, whose son, Rand Paul, is a senator from Kentucky, is an anti-abortion Christian libertarian whom the media repeatedly, erroneously, and maliciously tries to link to Ayn Rand’s philosophy, Objectivism, often through his son (see post here). Rep. Paul opposes any military action by the United States of America under any circumstances, unless the U.S. is physically attacked first. So, for example, Ron Paul would not pre-emptively attack Iran if he had knowledge that Iran was preparing to strike the United States with a nuclear missile. An American city would have to be nuked first before he would even consider striking back. In fact, Rep. Paul stated in a recent Iowa debate that Iran should be free to develop nuclear weapons; he is, practically speaking, pro-Iran. For this reason alone, and because he fraudulently claims to advocate man’s rights and capitalism, he is the most dangerous candidate for president.

Unfortunately, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, also a libertarian Republican, comes to the same conclusion as Ron Paul toward Iran; that the jihadist state is not a threat. The rest, including Newt Gingrich, one of the worst and most ineffective speakers of the House of Representatives, because he fraudulently claimed to advance capitalism and instead set it back years, possibly decades, seek more religion in government and/or more government in economics. Gingrich single-handedly sabotaged the 1994 Republican revolution, squandering the biggest electoral repudiation of the welfare state of the 20th century. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is not a candidate, as he proclaims loudly and often, which is good because he supports building a mosque in Manhattan near Ground Zero where jihadists attacked America.

This raises an interesting point; the influence of Islamism or jihadism in American politics and government. Amid various rumors or reports of jihadist or jihadist-allied connections to, or sponsorship of, certain candidates, such as Gov. Christie and Gov. Perry, it is important to remember that we are a nation at war with Islamic totalitarianism and its state sponsors. As an advocate for capitalism and individual rights, I support no one candidate at this stage of the campaign, for the above reasons, though, lacking a secular candidate to run against President Obama, who is destroying the United States of America, I am open to rational arguments. But our crippled country is especially vulnerable to jihadist Moslem infiltration and, just as Communist Soviets infiltrated our highest levels of government in the 20th century, it can happen again. Americans in the press, writing blogs, using social media and in the public should be vigilant about enemies within and this includes the GOP candidates and President Obama, his campaign and his administration. Religious soldiers of God blended into American culture ten years ago next month to launch the worst assault in U.S. history, still unavenged, and, because Bush and Obama failed to crush the enemy, jihadist Islam will almost certainly try to strike from within again. Because every major candidate opposes capitalism and individual rights, and seeks government control of our lives, and because Americans have allowed politicians to bring our nation closer to the brink of dictatorship, we should reject the ways of the past, demand a secular candidate who will roll back Obama’s fascist laws and respect separation of religion and state. And we should treat every candidate with suspicion.

Oregon Sen. Mark Hatfield, 1922-2011

8 August 2011

Former Oregon Sen. Mark O. Hatfield, 89, died yesterday. The Portland Oregonian posted an excellent obituary about the World War 2 veteran’s long career. Read the article here. The piece by Jeff Mapes makes me realize me how influential the evangelical Christian Senator Hatfield, the son of two deeply religious Baptists, was in shaping conservative Republican politics. Hatfield was anti-war, deeply religious, and a serious advocate of environmentalism. In other words, he was an early trailblazer, pardon the Oregon pun, in fusing fundamentalist religion with a liberal, welfare-statist approach to government. Though he was considered a maverick, out-of-step liberal anomaly in Republican circles during most of his 30-year career in the United States Senate, and he had also served as Oregon’s governor, Mark Hatfield was a forerunner to today’s dogmatic Big Government advocates on the left and on the right. Mark Hatfield paved the way for faith-based liberals and Big Government conservatives. In a sad coincidence, according to the Oregonian obituary, Senator Hatfield’s grandson, a U.S. Marine who had served in Iraq also named Mark, died of an undisclosed cause in Connecticut at the age of 25 four weeks ago. I wrote about military suicides over two years ago, and I wonder if Sen. Hatfield’s grandson, like so many soldiers enlisted in America’s asinine wars of self-sacrifice, killed himself. While I disagreed with Sen. Hatfield on nearly every issue, when I met the late senator and his son Mark during a political campaign, I personally found both gentlemen to be as kind and cordial as the article suggests. He certainly made an impact on American government.

Death of a Toymaker

29 July 2011

Today, as the nation reels from an historic debate about its astronomical debt, it seems proper to note that Hot Wheels creator Elliot Handler died this month. He was 95. If you’ve never heard of him, and I did not know his name until I read his obituary, you’ve very likely heard of what he made: besides the Hot Wheels toy cars, he made Mattel, which he founded as a home-based business, into America’s largest toy manufacturer. He was what those men and women in Washington cutting sleazy little deals over how to control our lives and punish us for being productive are not: he was a creator. Unlike Congress and the President, he made things of value.

According to USA Today, Handler started making dollhouse furniture and other wooden toys from scraps and among Mattel’s first hit products was a child-size ukulele, and I think I had one of those, or one of my siblings did, and a cap pistol. I used to play cowboys and Indians with those, too. As the paper’s obit has it, Mr. Handler’s Mattel put its entire net worth on the line, which at that time was $500,000, on sponsorship of a television program called The Mickey Mouse Club. Disney’s program for ABC was a success and the sponsorship made Mattel a household name, with annual sales growing from $5 million to $14 million in three years.

Mattel made cultural icons, such as the Barbie doll, named after his daughter (Ken was named for their son) and created by his wife, Ruth, in 1959. Later, Elliot Handler invented uniquely miniature die-cast metal vehicles with sporty designs. Mattel, based in southern California, branded them Hot Wheels and brought them to market in 1968. Hot Wheels caught on with boys and soon put the hugely popular die-cast metal Matchbox line of toy cars, a more realistic replica of motor vehicles which included ambulances, station wagons, trucks and farm vehicles, out of business. I strongly preferred Matchbox to Hot Wheels, but I used those yellowish-orange Hot Wheels tracks and loops to run my Matchbox cars all over the livingroom and I’m grateful for what Elliot Handler created. What he produced gave me hours of indulging my imagination and making up some of my first stories, which included plots from whatever I’d just read or watched on television, from spy missions to fending off Soviet attacks and Nazi counterstrikes. What he sadly leaves behind is a country in which his kind, the creator who makes money from what he creates, is no longer welcome.