Blog

Archive: June 2010

Memphis Beat

28 June 2010

Jason Lee leads a new cable television drama, Memphis Beat, which premiered on Turner Network Television (TNT) earlier this week. Judging by next week’s episode, “Baby, Let’s Play House,” which I recently previewed, this one-hour series is middling but it has potential. Lee plays Dwight Hendricks, a police detective with roots in the city’s blues music scene, and he contends with a kid’s claim that his dad was kidnapped, a colorful partner, and an ex-girlfriend with whom he still has sex. It’s a lowdown affair. The problems mostly relate to a distinct lack of conflict and spotty directing of the talented cast. Juliette Lewis (What’s Eating Gilbert Grape) guest stars as the kid’s mother and the episode I watched also features Celia Weston as Dwight’s mom in a thematically related subplot. The tie-in works well, thanks to series regular Alfre Woodard as the cop’s boss, but the show (created by West Virginia-native Joshua Harto) needs to punch up the crime, the stakes, and the performances (the ex-girlfriend character adds nothing). But the riff on Memphis as a convergence of interesting characters is in tune.

New: History of the Holocaust

27 June 2010

Oxford University Press recently published the 1998 Politik der Vernichtung (Politics of Destruction) by Peter Longerich (Professor of Modern German History at Royal Holloway, University of London) in English. The result, Holocaust: The Nazi Persecution and Murder of the Jews, is an exhaustive account of the National Socialists’ systematic extermination of Jews (among others) during World War 2. Using mostly primary sources from various archives throughout Europe, including Germany and eastern Europe, Longerich examines the Nazi murderers and their decision making process, demonstrating that the mass murder of the Jews was a “central tenet” of the Nazi philosophy, which was crucial to Nazi policies.

This hardcover reference volume, making use of the 1930s archives of the Central Association of German Citizens of the Jewish Faith, which re-emerged in the 1990s after years in Soviet Russia, relies on letters and reports detailing attacks on Jews by Germans. The documents show how the German volk (people) embraced Nazi attacks on Jews. Filled with notes, a bibliography and an index, this is a factual history, not a philosophical examination, of Nazi Germany’s atrocities (for why the Holocaust happened, read The Ominous Parallels by Leonard Peikoff).

“In the first month of the war,” Longerich writes, “Jews were almost wholly excluded from German society…In September 1939, for example, an (unpublished) general 8 p.m. curfew was imposed on Jews, their radios were confiscated, and their telephones were disconnected in summer 1940.” He continues: “Jews’ ration cards were marked with a ‘J’, they were only permitted to use certain shops, and the times when they were permitted to shop were strictly regulated by the municipality (and often limited to one hour a day)…These drastic measures had the effect of starving the Jewish population and ensuring that they devoted most of their energies to obtaining food.”

Longerich describes Treblinka as a “densely forested setting” which was “screened off from the eyes of the outside world.” At first, the mass murder at Treblinka was, he writes, “a crazed massacre” with an arrival area that was scattered with corpses. When new Jews arrived to see the mayhem, he explains, “[Nazi] guards reacted to the panic that arose with further shootings.” By the end of 1942, he notes, “precisely 713,555 people had been murdered in Treblinka.”

With a new introduction and new material on the victims, ghettos, and death camps, Longerich, currently working on a biography of SS leader Heinrich Himmler, has “significantly reworked, shortened in some places and extended in others” his history of the Holocaust into over 600 pages. This should be another important resource for those seeking knowledge of the 20th century’s second most evil dictatorship.

British Petroleum CEO John Browne Interviewed in 1997

21 June 2010

With the press and the Obama administration making British Petroleum (BP) into an arch-enemy of mankind in the wake of the nation’s worst oil spill at BP’s offshore oil drilling facility in the Gulf of Mexico, I found a couple of interesting counterpoints. “Three Myths About Oil,” a commentary about the oil business by energy analyst Alex Epstein of the Ayn Rand Institute, offers an excellent overview of the relevant facts about demand and drilling for oil that challenges the predominant views.

The other is an interesting 1997 interview with then-BP Chief Executive Officer (CEO) John Browne published in the Harvard Business Review. Mr. Browne comes across as a thoughtful company leader. When asked about the changing rules of competition, he replies, in part: “If we drill each well more efficiently than the last one, we can make a lot more money–which is exactly what we’re trying to do.” His point that the profit motive is the best assurance of quality drilling procedures is well taken and, whatever BP’s decisions since he was in charge, the extent of BP’s role in causing the current spill will undoubtedly affect their ability to make money in the future, indeed, if BP even survives as a company.

John Browne also talked about the difficulty of deep water drilling, which is essentially mandated by the government due to environmentalist bans and concerns about closer offshore drilling. Browne said: “We have a big acreage position in the deep water of the Gulf of Mexico, where drilling is an enormous technical challenge. The water there is between 2,000 and 8,000 feet deep, and then you have to drill 7,000 and 12,000 feet below the seabed to reach hydrocarbons. Because the water is so deep, you can’t affix anything to the seabed, and no human being can go down that far. So you have to use special vessels to drill. They are very expensive, and because it’s fashionable to be drilling in this area, they’re becoming even more expensive. In 1995, we spent 100 days on average drilling deepwater wells. We now spend 42.”

That was 1997 and it certainly sounds as though BP was well aware of the risks and was working to measurably reduce exposure to risk. There is no dispute that government regulations and bans on offshore oil drilling are an integral part of the cause of the current spill and the attacks on British Petroleum by the U.S. government are a deflection based on the government’s guilt in causing the destruction. To whatever extent BP made mistakes, they should make amends, but when it comes to oil, safety, and fixing problems, I trust BP more than I trust the government.

I do not know much about the company’s rich history, but I am generally impressed by Mr. Browne in the Harvard Business Review interview, conducted by Steven Prokesch. Asked about business relationships, echoing banker John Allison’s views on self-interest in business, Mr. Browne explains: “You can’t create an enduring business by viewing relationships as a bazaar activity–in which I try to get the best of you and you of me–or in which you pass off as much risk as you can to the other guy. Rather, we must view relationships as a coming together that allows us to do something no other two parties could do–something that makes the pie bigger and is to your advantage and to my advantage.” He goes on to cite a case involving oil field services company Schlumberger, which developed a logging tool for BP which allowed BP to better gauge drilling horizontal wells.

Browne also offered six points on building distinctive relationships. “The most important aspect of any relationship,” he answered, “is understanding what your partners hope to get out of it and to work hard to help them achieve that goal. It is the key to transforming a contractual relationship into a genuine collaboration.” Point two is that you have to deliver on promises. Third, he said, “you never build a relationship between your organization and a company or a government. You build it between individuals.” Fourth, Browne advised keeping relationships relatively open, flexible and cooperative; fifth, that you approach an opportunity with what he calls humility, by which I think he means an awareness of one’s limitations, and sixth, that you build relationships for the long-term. Responding to the follow up question, he recommended that businesses “instill the belief that competitive performance matters–that producing value is everyone’s job and that to produce value you need to focus so that you don’t get distracted by things that aren’t central.”

Later in the interview, he relates the story of how BP’s step-by-step approach to horizontal drilling resulted in oil wells he calls “the longest drilled in the history of the oil industry” that saved the company $ 75 million. Mr. Browne concluded: “So, contrary to what some may believe, you can institutionalize breakthrough thinking.” [Emphasis his]. Yes, you can, if you are free to compete in business, to drill for oil, and, first and foremost, to think.

Summer in Vegas

15 June 2010

Next month’s Objectivist Conference (OCON) in Las Vegas will feature a fireworks display at the event’s host Red Rock Resort on the Fourth of July. The resort’s owner, Station Casinos, announced that the nine-minute show, produced by the Gruccis of New York and described as the largest fireworks show in southern Nevada, will celebrate the nation’s 234th birthday on Independence Day. Other OCON festivities on July 4th include a free OCON-sponsored celebration during the daytime. I reported on Red Rock as conference venue host in a previous post. Elsewhere in Las Vegas, hedonism appears to be spreading with a new trend in poolside entertainment: topless swimming pool parties. Read the article, unaccompanied by nude photos, in USA Today. Besides my scheduled classes, courses, and events during the conference, I am also planning on seeing the Penn and Teller show, seeing a movie at the Red Rock’s cinemas, and heading out on the town with friends.

Toy Story 3

12 June 2010

Toy Story 3The third in Pixar’s Toy Story animated pictures, Toy Story 3 (available for viewing in 3D), is a treat for the family. Beginning and staying with an exciting and extended sense of play (this Disney movie’s main theme), Andy’s toys fret about their future as the 17-year-old packs his stuff for college. The familiar characters are all here, led by Buzz Lightyear (voiced by Tim Allen) and Woody (voiced by Tom Hanks), and the 3D is fine if that’s your thing, though, as with Tim Burton’s Disney picture, Alice in Wonderland, the technology doesn’t make the movie (and the glasses are heavy on the bridge of the nose, as Chicago film critic Roger Ebert observed earlier this year). Andy gets a bit more screen time (apparently, he is an artist) and when his box of toys winds up at a day care center rather than in the attic, the toys break as usual from Woody’s loyalty to Andy and insist that it’s time to let go since, as they believe, they are no longer valued. One of the enjoyable aspects of Toy Story, and this is a Pixar quality born of John Lasseter and Steve Jobs, is a reverence for material possessions, contrary to those who denounce materialism and the concept of ownership, as inherently valuable to the individual owner (note the former’s worship of cars and the latter’s brilliant creation of things that improve our lives in Apple’s fabulous products). Toy Story 3 does not disappoint in upholding the ownership of toys and, in fact, when a counterfeit capitalist (Ned Beatty) shows up at day care praising individual initiative but seeking “the good of the community”, the toys get another lesson in the dangers of collectivism. Woody is a lone voice of reason, as usual, reminding himself to “think, think,” and leading by example in showing the toys (Jessie, Bullseye, Mr. and Mrs. Potato Head, Rex, Hamm, Slinky) the difference between a team of individuals and a group ruled by a dictator. Even Mattel’s Barbie (Jodi Benson, the voice of Ariel in The Little Mermaid) goes rogue, making a short speech about having the consent of the governed. But, mostly, TS3 is hilarious and fun, adding a classic Fisher-Price toy, Barbie’s Ken (Michael Keaton), who has to choose between self-absorption and self-interest, and the delightful wit and humor in Michael Arndt’s (Little Miss Sunshine) screenplay. Besides the running gag that the day care center is like a prison, there are peppered, veiled references to The Shawshank Redemption (a character voiced by Bud Luckey is a hoot) and even Saving Private Ryan‘s lesson that undeservedly forgiving an enemy soldier is a huge mistake. Toy Story 3 is not as new and fresh as the 1995 original. But it delivers the same clever, wholesome family entertainment of its predecessors and, in a toddler character named Bonnie, who represents the child at play and, in this context, man at his best, TS3 reminds us dearly and richly that having things, owning things, and “being played with”, matters very much indeed.

Artist Alex Dilts on Shakes and Jolly

8 June 2010

Animation artist Alex Dilts, whom I interviewed for a retrospective piece about Walt Disney’s Bambi, recently posted some of his unused work on his blog. These visual creations are based on his idea (with his partners) for a television program, Shakespeare and Jolly. “The premise,” Dilts writes, is that “an unemployed Shakespearean actor takes a job driving an ice cream truck. With each truck comes a jolly little clown to drum up business. Polar opposites, Shakes and Jolly try to make a living under the scrutiny of their domineering boss, insane meter maids, and strange playground dwellers. Not to mention a unique racial twist.” The artwork is outstanding, from a depiction of a marvelous looking company headquarters for Happy Bros. Ice Cream to a chop suey joint next to a dilapidated movie theater. Dilts told me he hasn’t given up on creating Shakes and Jolly for the small screen. I think it’s a terrific idea.

Korean War, Old Amusement Parks, and Norah Jones on PBS

6 June 2010

Three summer programs on the government’s Public Broadcasting System (PBS) look interesting.

In Unforgettable: The Korean War, Korean War (1950-1953) veterans recount their memories of America in the late 1940s and early 1950s, when young Americans were drafted by the government and shipped off to defend South Korea as United Nations forces against the invading Red Army in the north. For three long years, Americans fought North Korea and Communist China to save South Korea. The men recall the “un-won” war that never ended, which the Truman administration did not even want to call a war (it was “the Korean conflict” or a “police action.”) Finally, it was called the Forgotten War (for more on the Korean War, read my book review of Breakout: The Chosin Reservoir Campaign, Korea 1950 and my interview with its author, Martin Russ). PBS airs the program in the High-Definition (HD) format from 10 pm to 11 pm ET, Monday, June 21 (repeats 6/24/10, 10 pm to 11 pm ET).

PBS will re-broadcast a 1999 program, Great Old Amusement Parks, about the pre-Disney days before theme parks, when amusement parks were the places where families gathered for a cool escape on a hot summer day. Among the featured parks: Playland in Rye, New York, Holiday World in Santa Claus, Indiana, and Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk in northern California, where people can still ride the merry-go-round. The special also checks out some classic wooden rollercoasters and other rides (airs 8 pm to 9 pm ET on Wednesday, June 30). Later this summer, Soundstage features singer and pianist Norah Jones, whose debut album sold 18 million copies worldwide. This episode was filmed earlier this year at St. Ann’s Warehouse in New York City, with Ms. Jones performing a blend of covers, hits such as “Don’t Know Why” and “Come Away With Me,” and tracks from her newest album, The Fall (airs 10 pm to 11 pm ET, Thursday, July 1).

Statement on Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Ruling

3 June 2010

Based on new disclosure rules by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for bloggers, I am issuing the following disclaimer: I am a writer and journalist and, as such, I receive solicited and unsolicited promotional items, including books, DVDs, and unpaid passes for events such as movie screenings, for editorial consideration. These do not constitute payment of any kind and do not influence the editorial product of this Web site. So, I am disclosing that the films I review are generally consumed at press screenings, not consumed as a member of a paying audience. I will also post this statement on the site’s Terms & Conditions.